linux-kernel - Re: reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 2 Aug 2008 11:47:45 -0400
From:	"Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@...il.com>
To:	"Edward Shishkin" <edward.shishkin@...il.com>
Cc:	"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
	"Ric Wheeler" <ricwheeler@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Reiserfs mailing list" <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1

Can you explain a little more what this "plugin design documentation"
actually is and how it supposed to help?
-Ryan

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Edward Shishkin
<edward.shishkin@...il.com> wrote:
> Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> Theodore Tso wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:34:53PM -0400, Ryan Hope wrote:
>>>
>
> Hi, I am here :)
> Join our mailing list:
>
> http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#reiserfs-devel
> http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&r=1&w=2
>
> There are many interesting tasks to resolve/investigate..
>
>>>> Hmmm, removing the plugin support might not be so hard....  I might
>>>> have to try this...
>
> Please, don't try to do this.
>
> I am working on the plugin design document. It will be ready
> approximately in September. I believe that it'll address all the
> mentioned complaints.
>
>>>> I am not impressed with btrfs yet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, if you're going to work on reiser4 (and I think there were other
>>> people who had also expressed interest/plans to work on it; you might
>>> try doing a search on the various mailing lists so you can coordinate
>>> with them and avoid duplicating work), my suggestion to you would be
>>> to find the comments that were made by the reviewers way back when,
>>> and make sure those comments have been addressed.
>>>
>>> Then, re-requests a code review, and promise that you won't abuse, and
>>> insult the integrity and impugn the motivations of the reviewers
>
> Well, Ted, I'll promise ;)
> We'll adhere strictly the propositional logic in the review thread..
>
> Thanks,
> Edward.
>
>>> like
>>> Hans did, and hopefully after they review the code, fix those problems
>>> as well.  Then you can try resubmitting for inclusion.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>                                              - Ted
>>>
>>
>> My most up to date information is that Edward is still actively
>> working on reiser4....
>>
>> ric
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/