[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48959288.4040108@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:12:08 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Abdel Benamrouche <draconux@...il.com>, stable@...nel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, 2.6.26.2-rc1] fs/partition/check.c: fix return value warning
Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Willy, this good to know ...
>
> and I think, this patch fixed a small leak:
>
> +
> +out2:
> + device_del(&p->dev);
> +out1:
> + put_device(&p->dev);
> + free_part_stats(p);
> +out0:
> + kfree(p);
> + return err;
>
>
> On 8/2/08, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 12:56:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> Please don't just send patches to the stable team because they "look
>>> fine". They should be real bugs, with real consequences. And no, a
>>> compiler warning is not a real consequence.
Oliver, check under which circumstances the leak happens, and which
problems the leak causes for the system.
Newly added failure handling paths, which by nature are insufficiently
runtime-tested, need to be well considered before they are taken over
into -stable even if the code looks OK. I.e. they need to address bugs
which are known to cause problems of certain severity in practice.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists