[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1fxpm8x3n.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:51:40 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] dyn_array and nr_irqs support v3
It appears that quite a few of the places you have changed are testing
to see if an irq is valid. The idiomatic way to perform that test in
the kernel is:
if (irq)
With no test to see if you are >= NR_IRQS.
I expect that is the change we want in the drivers that are performing such a silly
extra check.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists