lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:41:51 -0700
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"nacc@...ibm.com" <nacc@...ibm.com>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BISECTION RESULT] sched: revert cpu_clock to
 pre-27ec4407790d075c325e1f4da0a19c56953cce23 state

> I'm looking at that ... but it is a bit more complex.  We only have
> a "__per_cpu" block in the kernel on uni-processor systems. For
> larger systems we dynamically allocate, and we have two different
> mechanisms to that (one for SMP and one for NUMA).

Humm.  Perhaps I can always build in __per_cpu and use it for
cpu 0.  And then fix the assembly in head.S to point at that
for cpu 0.  For other cpus I's also need to pass the allocation
address of their per-cpu block to the early asm code so they
could set up ar.k3 too.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ