linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] h8300 update timer handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080804161653.0ee4a3a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:16:53 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] h8300 update timer handler

On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:34:06 -0400 Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp> wrote:

> h8300 new timer handlers.
> 
> 1/3 - new timer handler
> 2/3 - delete obsolute files
> 3/3 - misc update

Could you please always describe your changes more completely?

We are provided no explanation of why the old code was removed, why the
new code is added, what problems were fixed, etc.

The way these patches have been documented, I have no way of knowing
whether or not they should be merged into 2.6.27.  Do you think they
should be?  If so, why?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/