linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] h8300 update timer handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:53:04 -0400
From:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] h8300 update timer handler

At Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:16:53 -0700,
Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:34:06 -0400 Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp> wrote:
> 
> > h8300 new timer handlers.
> > 
> > 1/3 - new timer handler
> > 2/3 - delete obsolute files
> > 3/3 - misc update
> 
> Could you please always describe your changes more completely?
> 
> We are provided no explanation of why the old code was removed, why the
> new code is added, what problems were fixed, etc.

I added new target.
Because duplicate same timer handler.
And old code little complex.
 
> The way these patches have been documented, I have no way of knowing
> whether or not they should be merged into 2.6.27.  Do you think they
> should be?  If so, why?

This patch need new target only.
I don't early.

> Thanks.

-- 
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/