linux-kernel - Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] xfs: remove vmap cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4896A070.2010805@sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:23:44 +1000
From:	Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@....com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
CC:	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 2/3] xfs: remove vmap cache

Nick Piggin wrote:
> XFS's vmap batching simply defers a number (up to 64) of vunmaps, and keeps
> track of them in a list. To purge the batch, it just goes through the list and
> calls vunamp on each one. This is pretty poor: a global TLB flush is still
> performed on each vunmap, with the most expensive parts of the operation
> being the broadcast IPIs and locking involved in the SMP callouts, and the
> locking involved in the vmap management -- none of these are avoided by just
> batching up the calls. I'm actually surprised it ever made much difference
> at all.
So am I.

> 
> Rip all this logic out of XFS completely. I improve vmap performance
> and scalability directly in the previous and subsequent patch.
Sounds good to me.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> ---
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -166,75 +166,6 @@ test_page_region(
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - *	Mapping of multi-page buffers into contiguous virtual space
> - */
> -
> -typedef struct a_list {
> -	void		*vm_addr;
> -	struct a_list	*next;
> -} a_list_t;
> -
> -static a_list_t		*as_free_head;
> -static int		as_list_len;
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(as_lock);
> -
> -/*
> - *	Try to batch vunmaps because they are costly.
> - */
> -STATIC void
> -free_address(
> -	void		*addr)
> -{
> -	a_list_t	*aentry;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> -	/*
> -	 * Xen needs to be able to make sure it can get an exclusive
> -	 * RO mapping of pages it wants to turn into a pagetable.  If
> -	 * a newly allocated page is also still being vmap()ed by xfs,
> -	 * it will cause pagetable construction to fail.  This is a
> -	 * quick workaround to always eagerly unmap pages so that Xen
> -	 * is happy.
> -	 */
> -	vunmap(addr);
> -	return;
> -#endif
> -
> -	aentry = kmalloc(sizeof(a_list_t), GFP_NOWAIT);
> -	if (likely(aentry)) {
> -		spin_lock(&as_lock);
> -		aentry->next = as_free_head;
> -		aentry->vm_addr = addr;
> -		as_free_head = aentry;
> -		as_list_len++;
> -		spin_unlock(&as_lock);
> -	} else {
> -		vunmap(addr);
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -STATIC void
> -purge_addresses(void)
> -{
> -	a_list_t	*aentry, *old;
> -
> -	if (as_free_head == NULL)
> -		return;
> -
> -	spin_lock(&as_lock);
> -	aentry = as_free_head;
> -	as_free_head = NULL;
> -	as_list_len = 0;
> -	spin_unlock(&as_lock);
> -
> -	while ((old = aentry) != NULL) {
> -		vunmap(aentry->vm_addr);
> -		aentry = aentry->next;
> -		kfree(old);
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -/*
>   *	Internal xfs_buf_t object manipulation
>   */
>  
> @@ -334,7 +265,7 @@ xfs_buf_free(
>  		uint		i;
>  
>  		if ((bp->b_flags & XBF_MAPPED) && (bp->b_page_count > 1))
> -			free_address(bp->b_addr - bp->b_offset);
> +			vunmap(bp->b_addr - bp->b_offset);
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < bp->b_page_count; i++) {
>  			struct page	*page = bp->b_pages[i];
> @@ -456,8 +387,6 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages(
>  		bp->b_addr = page_address(bp->b_pages[0]) + bp->b_offset;
>  		bp->b_flags |= XBF_MAPPED;
>  	} else if (flags & XBF_MAPPED) {
> -		if (as_list_len > 64)
> -			purge_addresses();
>  		bp->b_addr = vmap(bp->b_pages, bp->b_page_count,
>  					VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
>  		if (unlikely(bp->b_addr == NULL))
> @@ -1739,8 +1668,6 @@ xfsbufd(
>  			count++;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (as_list_len > 0)
> -			purge_addresses();
>  		if (count)
>  			blk_run_address_space(target->bt_mapping);
>  
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/