[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080805102749.6ae24947@bull.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:27:49 +0200
From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
michael@...erman.id.au, jean-pierre.dion@...l.net,
gilles.carry@....bull.net, tinytim@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:05:03 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > - Remove the populating of the tree from the revmap function as
> > you already do
> > - Move it to irq_create_mapping() for the normal case
> > - For pre-existing interrupt, have the generic code that initializes
> > the radix tree walk through all interrupts and setup the revmap for
> > them. If that needs locking vs. concurrent irq_create_mapping, it's
> > easy to use one of the available spinlocks for that.
>
> And in fact, you may even be able to avoid GFP_ATOMIC completely here
> and switch it to GFP_KERNEL since irq_create_mapping() can sleep afaik,
> provided that you avoid the spinlocking.
Well, maybe, will have to look into this in details.
Thanks,
Sebastien.
>
> Ben.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists