[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1217898303.24157.122.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:05:03 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
michael@...erman.id.au, jean-pierre.dion@...l.net,
gilles.carry@....bull.net, tinytim@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
> - Remove the populating of the tree from the revmap function as
> you already do
> - Move it to irq_create_mapping() for the normal case
> - For pre-existing interrupt, have the generic code that initializes
> the radix tree walk through all interrupts and setup the revmap for
> them. If that needs locking vs. concurrent irq_create_mapping, it's
> easy to use one of the available spinlocks for that.
And in fact, you may even be able to avoid GFP_ATOMIC completely here
and switch it to GFP_KERNEL since irq_create_mapping() can sleep afaik,
provided that you avoid the spinlocking.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists