[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808051848330.19162@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?
from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
#define INITCALLS \
*(.initcallearly.init) \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .; \
*(.initcall0.init) \
*(.initcall0s.init) \
*(.initcall1.init) \
*(.initcall1s.init) \
... etc ...
but from include/linux/init.h:
#define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
#define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
#define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
#define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
#define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
i don't see any initcalls of level "0s". in any event, might it not
be cleaner to have these files sync up? no big deal, of course. i'm
well aware that it doesn't break anything.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists