[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489A221A.3030409@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:13:46 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?
On 06-08-08 00:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
>
> #define INITCALLS \
> *(.initcallearly.init) \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .; \
> *(.initcall0.init) \
> *(.initcall0s.init) \
> *(.initcall1.init) \
> *(.initcall1s.init) \
> ... etc ...
>
> but from include/linux/init.h:
>
> #define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
>
> #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
> #define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
> #define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
> #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
>
> i don't see any initcalls of level "0s". in any event, might it not
> be cleaner to have these files sync up? no big deal, of course. i'm
> well aware that it doesn't break anything.
Last I heard, all sync levels were on their way out (Arjan).
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists