linux-kernel - Re: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808061818440.19308@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:18:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?

On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rene Herman wrote:

> On 06-08-08 00:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >   from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
> >
> > #define INITCALLS                                                       \
> >         *(.initcallearly.init)                                          \
> >         VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .;                       \
> >         *(.initcall0.init)                                              \
> >         *(.initcall0s.init)                                             \
> >         *(.initcall1.init)                                              \
> >         *(.initcall1s.init)                                             \
> > ... etc ...
> >
> >   but from include/linux/init.h:
> >
> > #define pure_initcall(fn)               __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
> >
> > #define core_initcall(fn)               __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
> > #define core_initcall_sync(fn)          __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
> > #define postcore_initcall(fn)           __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
> > #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn)      __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
> >
> >   i don't see any initcalls of level "0s".  in any event, might it not
> > be cleaner to have these files sync up?  no big deal, of course.  i'm
> > well aware that it doesn't break anything.
>
> Last I heard, all sync levels were on their way out (Arjan).

ah, i was unaware of that, thanks.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/