[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1ej4zvw6s.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:00:59 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/42] introduce nr_irqs
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> and at this point it is equal NR_IRQS
This patch is ok, but this approach is fundamentally broken.
Only 19 architectures use GENERIC_HARDIRQS
The only required interface is interrupt.h not irq.h
So you may not replace NR_IRQS with nr_irqs in anything other
then genirq code and some architecture code.
Doing so will break the build on several architectures.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists