[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440808081838r66cc8162t5c2e157908457048@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:38:51 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/42] introduce nr_irqs
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
>
>> and at this point it is equal NR_IRQS
>
> This patch is ok, but this approach is fundamentally broken.
> Only 19 architectures use GENERIC_HARDIRQS
>
> The only required interface is interrupt.h not irq.h
>
> So you may not replace NR_IRQS with nr_irqs in anything other
> then genirq code and some architecture code.
>
> Doing so will break the build on several architectures.
some platforms will not use include/linux/irq.h and kernel/irq/handle.c ?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists