lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:59:38 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/42] introduce nr_irqs Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote: >> Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes: >> >>> and at this point it is equal NR_IRQS >> This patch is ok, but this approach is fundamentally broken. >> Only 19 architectures use GENERIC_HARDIRQS >> >> The only required interface is interrupt.h not irq.h >> >> So you may not replace NR_IRQS with nr_irqs in anything other >> then genirq code and some architecture code. >> >> Doing so will break the build on several architectures. > > some platforms will not use include/linux/irq.h and kernel/irq/handle.c ? > Also, what's the point, if it's just a renaming? -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists