[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489CF599.8050601@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:40:41 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, muli@...ibm.com, joro@...tes.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
jakub@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes [v2]
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:15:51 -0700
> Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Friday, August 8, 2008 8:18 am Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>>> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline unsigned int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct
>>> device
>>> static inline unsigned long dma_get_seg_boundary(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> return dev->dma_parms ?
>>> - dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask : 0xffffffff;
>>> + dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask : 0xffffffffUL;
>>> }
>>>
>> Yeah generally you need to cast values like this when working with real
>> unsigned long values rather than ints, but this *should* still be safe
>> (barring a compiler bug). The return type is unsigned long, so even if you
>> just return 0xffffffff the right thing should still happen...
>>
>
> I told Prarid that the overflow should not happen here again and
> again...
>
I misunderstood what was going on here.
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists