[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080810110705.GD16146@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:07:05 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"D. Kelly" <user.kernel@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"mailing list: linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux I2C <i2c@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with restricted I2C algorithms in kernel 2.6.26!
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:52:05AM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:41:10 -0700 (PDT), Trent Piepho wrote:
> > > Expecting every developer to keep abreast of linux-next and the tens of
> > > thousands of patches it gets just isn't realisitic.
> > >
> > > The embedded platforms I develop on won't run linux-next. Continuously
> > > porting them to linux-next is simply impossible. The man hours required to
> > > do that would be staggering.
> >
> > Once again a "believe me it's impossible" without any good reason
> > given. I fail to see why embedded platforms would be any different from
> > other platforms or subsystem trees. Please enlighten me.
>
> Because they usually require lots of additional patches that aren't in the
> kernel. Sometimes embedded developers try to get these patches into the
> mainline kernel, but some maintainers aren't interested in accepting
> patches that don't appear to be useful to desktop users.
>...
The last thing mustn't happen.
Can you give examples?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists