[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13299.1218367912@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:31:52 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@....co.uk>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Jasper Bryant-Greene <jasper@...ton.co.nz>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: next-20080808: bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@....co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:45:39 +0100
> David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > Are you running as an unprivileged user? If so, this may be the point
> > that's biting you. Can you try applying the attached patch to find more
> > information?
> [snip]
> I'm also experiencing this on an X86_64 system as an unprivileged user.
Thanks for your help.
> With your patch applied I get the following repeated several times
> during the boot, but with no apparent ill effects:
>
> [ 31.033195] copy_process() = -513
That's probably nothing to worry about. It -ERESTARTNOINTR, indicating, I
would guess, that fork() was interrupted by a signal.
> When the fork call starts to fail after a few minutes the following is logged:
>
> [ 223.039938] Rlimit EAGAIN (-1 >= 16375, uid 1000)
> [ 223.044744] copy_process() = -11
> [ 226.660319] Rlimit EAGAIN (-1 >= 16375, uid 1000)
> [ 226.664166] copy_process() = -11
Okay. That's useful, thanks. That indicates that my accounting of user
processes is incorrect somewhere. This won't show up when running as a
privileged user only.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists