linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] V4L1: make PMS not autoprobe when builtin.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080810223719.446bf52a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:37:19 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	video4linux-list@...hat.com,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V4L1: make PMS not autoprobe when builtin.

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:37:29 +0200
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> wrote:

> Hi Andrew.
> 
> Alternate version of the PMS patch sent yesterday. This one makes it 
> need explicit enabling when builtin and doesn't change anything when 
> modular as per Alan Cox's comments.
> 
> This is a deprecated, unused driver meaning it doesn't matter. It still 
> fixes that (randconfig testing breakage) which it is supposed to fix.


Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>


Would probably make the printk "pms: not enabled, use pms.enable=1 to
probe"

So you know
a) What is wittering about not being probed
b) How to undo it.

But thats trivia really.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/