linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] V4L1: make PMS not autoprobe when builtin.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <489F6665.2020105@keyaccess.nl>
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:06:29 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	video4linux-list@...hat.com,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V4L1: make PMS not autoprobe when builtin.

On 10-08-08 23:37, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:37:29 +0200
> Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> wrote:

>> Alternate version of the PMS patch sent yesterday. This one makes it 
>> need explicit enabling when builtin and doesn't change anything when 
>> modular as per Alan Cox's comments.
>>
>> This is a deprecated, unused driver meaning it doesn't matter. It still 
>> fixes that (randconfig testing breakage) which it is supposed to fix.
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> 
> 
> Would probably make the printk "pms: not enabled, use pms.enable=1 to
> probe"
> 
> So you know
> a) What is wittering about not being probed
> b) How to undo it.
> 
> But thats trivia really.

I suppose I wouldn't be messing with these drivers in the first place if 
I weren't deeply into trivia, so <bow> ...

Rene.

View attachment "0001-V4L1-make-PMS-not-autoprobe-when-builtin.patch" of type "text/plain" (1368 bytes)