[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A0DDEC.704@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:48:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem
with fpu state changes
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:42:21PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> That's not sufficient, though, because you have to track all the state
>> and how it relates to everything. You now have to track both the
>> userspace FPU state and the potential kernel FPU state. The VIA
>> instructions are special (in the short bus to school sense) in that they
>> use a mechanism intended to protect specific state to protect -- exactly
>> nothing.
>
> Sorry, the kernel TS state is what I meant. I'm definitely not
> advocating the saving of the kernel FPU state. This is only for
> things like the VIA (which also exists for other processors, see
> the xor SSE stuff in include/asm-x86).
No, there you are actually using the FPU state (which includes the SSE
state.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists