[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080812193031.GD18034@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:30:31 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, safford@...son.ibm.com,
sailer@...son.ibm.com, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kenneth Goldman <kgold@...son.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:13:51PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> I assume the concern here is that between looking up the chip and actually
>
> using the chip, the TPM chip is disabled/deactivated. Based on
> discussions
> with Kenneth Goldman, the TCG main specification part2: structures,
> require
> that even if the TPM is disabled/deactivated, the command to extend the
> PCR
> will succeed, but the command to read the PCR will fail with an
> appropriate
> error code.
And what happens when the chip simply goes away due to a hotplug action?
Or not even the actual chip goes away but just the chip driver and you
now dereference freed memory?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists