[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF6C940C00.249617D7-ON852574A3.0071F8B0-852574A3.00732160@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:57:31 -0400
From: Kenneth Goldman <kgoldman@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote on 08/12/2008 03:30:31 PM:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:13:51PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > I assume the concern here is that between looking up the chip and
actually
> >
> > using the chip, the TPM chip is disabled/deactivated. Based on
> > discussions
> > with Kenneth Goldman, the TCG main specification part2: structures,
> > require
> > that even if the TPM is disabled/deactivated, the command to extend the
> > PCR
> > will succeed, but the command to read the PCR will fail with an
> > appropriate
> > error code.
>
> And what happens when the chip simply goes away due to a hotplug action?
> Or not even the actual chip goes away but just the chip driver and you
> now dereference freed memory?
Being a TCG/TPM person, I can only address the first question. The
intent is that the TPM is soldered to the planar/motherboard (the TCG
uses the phrase "bound to the platform"). I can't imagine
any manufacturer designing a pluggable TPM. It would subvert PCR
measurements and thus attestation, data sealing, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists