[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1218519496.3107.235.camel@debian.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:38:16 +0800
From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 1/1] iwlwifi: fix printk newlines
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 05:59 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > We should give the users more control to the style I think.
>
> what kind of control do you expect? If you need two lines of debug or
> error output, call IWL_ERROR twice. This will also result in the
> KERN_ERR is set and not forgotten since that has to follow the
> newline.
I thought sometimes we might not need a new line between two IWL_ERRORs.
But your KERN_ERR garbaging the output in this case is correct. I think
when we wrote the macro, we just follow the style of dev_info() ...
dev_emerg() macros. Do you know why there is not a new line for them by
default?
Thanks,
-yi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists