[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1218521518.25524.37.camel@californication>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:11:58 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 1/1] iwlwifi: fix printk newlines
Hi Yi,
> > > We should give the users more control to the style I think.
> >
> > what kind of control do you expect? If you need two lines of debug or
> > error output, call IWL_ERROR twice. This will also result in the
> > KERN_ERR is set and not forgotten since that has to follow the
> > newline.
>
> I thought sometimes we might not need a new line between two IWL_ERRORs.
> But your KERN_ERR garbaging the output in this case is correct. I think
> when we wrote the macro, we just follow the style of dev_info() ...
> dev_emerg() macros. Do you know why there is not a new line for them by
> default?
I have no idea. Maybe because they are close to printk. I always put the
newline into my macros.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists