[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080813122341.GA31815@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:23:41 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] [WATCHDOG] mpc8xxx_wdt: fix modular build
This patch fixes following build error when mpc8xxx_wdt is selected to
build as a module:
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:304: error: redefinition of '__inittest'
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:298: error: previous definition of '__inittest' was here
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:304: error: redefinition of 'init_module'
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:298: error: previous definition of 'init_module' was here
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
---
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:10:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:29:18PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Please pull from 'master' branch of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog.git
> > or if master.kernel.org hasn't synced up yet:
> > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog.git
> >
> > This will update the following files:
> >
> > Author: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> > Date: Thu Jul 3 23:51:36 2008 -0700
> >
> > [WATCHDOG] mpc8xxx_wdt: add support for MPC8xx watchdogs
>
> This is broken when built modular because this...
>
> > +}
> > +module_init(mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late);
>
> and this ..
>
> > +arch_initcall(mpc8xxx_wdt_init);
>
> Can't be mixed. You end up with two init_module invocations
>
> drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:304: error: redefinition of '__inittest'
> drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:298: error: previous definition of '__inittest' was here
> drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:304: error: redefinition of 'init_module'
> drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:298: error: previous definition of 'init_module' was here
>
> Given they both call different routines though, I'm not sure the right fix here.
Thanks for noticing!
Unfortunately I don't see any elegant way to fix this. In the long term,
it would be great if we could work with misc (thus watchdog) subsystem at
arch_initcall() time (yes, we need this early on 8xx). Until this happen,
I think this patch is the best fix we can do.
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c
index f209496..8e50bc4 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct mpc8xxx_wdt_type {
};
static struct mpc8xxx_wdt __iomem *wd_base;
+static int mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void);
static u16 timeout = 0xffff;
module_param(timeout, ushort, 0);
@@ -213,6 +214,12 @@ static int __devinit mpc8xxx_wdt_probe(struct of_device *ofdev,
else
timeout_sec = timeout / freq;
+#ifdef CONFIG_8xxx_WDT_MODULE
+ ret = mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late();
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_unmap;
+#endif
+
pr_info("WDT driver for MPC8xxx initialized. mode:%s timeout=%d "
"(%d seconds)\n", reset ? "reset" : "interrupt", timeout,
timeout_sec);
@@ -280,7 +287,7 @@ static struct of_platform_driver mpc8xxx_wdt_driver = {
* very early to start pinging the watchdog (misc devices are not yet
* available), and later module_init() just registers the misc device.
*/
-static int __init mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void)
+static int mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -295,7 +302,9 @@ static int __init mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late(void)
}
return 0;
}
+#ifndef CONFIG_8xxx_WDT_MODULE
module_init(mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late);
+#endif
static int __init mpc8xxx_wdt_init(void)
{
--
1.5.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists