[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080813031044.GA11258@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:10:44 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [WATCHDOG] v2.6.27-rc patches
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:29:18PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Please pull from 'master' branch of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog.git
> or if master.kernel.org hasn't synced up yet:
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog.git
>
> This will update the following files:
>
> Author: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> Date: Thu Jul 3 23:51:36 2008 -0700
>
> [WATCHDOG] mpc8xxx_wdt: add support for MPC8xx watchdogs
This is broken when built modular because this...
> +}
> +module_init(mpc8xxx_wdt_init_late);
and this ..
> +arch_initcall(mpc8xxx_wdt_init);
Can't be mixed. You end up with two init_module invocations
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:304: error: redefinition of '__inittest'
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:298: error: previous definition of '__inittest' was here
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:304: error: redefinition of 'init_module'
drivers/watchdog/mpc8xxx_wdt.c:298: error: previous definition of 'init_module' was here
Given they both call different routines though, I'm not sure the right fix here.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists