[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080813063533.444c650d@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:35:33 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Pardo <pardo@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hugh@...itas.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
briangrant@...gle.com, cgd@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to revisit
64b context switch optimization?
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:44:45 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> There are various other options to solve the (severe!) performance
> breakdown:
>
> 1- glibc could start not using MAP_32BIT for 64-bit thread stacks
> (the boxes where context-switching is slow probably do not matter all
> that much anymore - they were very slow at everything 64-bit anyway)
>
> Pros: easiest solution.
> Cons: slows down the affected machines and needs a new glibc.
>
>
> i'd go for 1) or 2).
I would go for 1) clearly; it's the cleanest thing going forward for
sure.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists