[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0808131222570.2308-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, <teheo@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: Power management for SCSI
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > For transports which are like USB, we should do autosuspend at the
> > target (not device) level. This means invoking the suspend/resume
> > routines of the ULDs like sd and sr. The transport gets notified when
> > all of the targets are suspended. (Or maybe the host driver gets
> > notified instead; there probably isn't any advantage to using the
> > transport class here.)
> >
> > For other transports, we should only do idle-timeout detection. The
> > transport gets notified when any target has been idle for sufficiently
> > long, so that it can power down the link. The ULDs are not involved.
> >
> > Does that sound okay?
>
> Minor correction: The ULD suspend/resume methods necessarily work on
> logical units, not targets.
Yes; I should said that the suspend/resume methods of the ULD for each
of the target's LUNs gets invoked.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists