[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200808131230.07581.mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:30:07 -0500
From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@....com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: invalidate caches before going into suspend
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> >
> > I don't think it's necessary. I can submit a delta patch later if you
> > think it's really necessary.
>
> Why not at least move it to after the local_irq_disable()?
>
> That local_irq_disable() will do tons of writes if you have
> lockdep enabled, it calls trace_hardirqs_off() etc. Maybe they don't end
> up ever mattering, but wouldn't it make much more sense to just move the
> wbinvd down to just before the
>
> while (1)
> halt();
>
> which is also likely to make sure that the compiler won't do anything at
> all because everything is dead at that point with no function calls etc
> happening.
I don't think we realized that local_irq_disable() did all that and
so we only tested the submitted patch. I've resubmitted the unified
patch after applying your suggestion. Thanks.
-Mark Langsdorf
Operating System Research Center
AMD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists