[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080813181850.GD4886@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:18:50 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Marcin Obara <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel Management Engine Interface
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:16:02AM +0100, Marcin Obara wrote:
> 2008/8/13 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:23:01PM +0200, Marcin Obara wrote:
> >> +/* IOCTL commands */
> >> +#define IOCTL_HECI_GET_VERSION \
> >> + _IOWR('H' , 0x0, struct heci_message_data)
> >
> > This can easily be a sysfs file, why not do that instead?
> >
> sysfs file would require additional file handle used by every userspace client.
So, is that really a great overhead?
> GET_VERSION is called frequently
Why? Shouldn't it only be called once?
>, and sysfs file would create extra overhead.
Have you measured it?
> With ioctl - only one file handle is used, and userspace client logic
> is simpler.
But the kernel is messier and we are trying to not add any more ioctls
to it. Especially for trivial things like the version number of the
hardware device.
> Normal flow looks like:
>
> open
> ioctl(GET_VERSION)
Great, do an additional open/read/close here for the version, I think
you will find it pretty trivial to do :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists