[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6453C3CB8E2B3646B0D020C112613273C5AC6B@sausexmb4.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:47:05 -0500
From: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>
To: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH](retry 2) Re: invalidate caches before going into suspend
> Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@....com> wrote:
> > + /* mask all interrupts, flush any and all caches, and halt */
> > + if (cpu_has_clflush)
> > + wbinvd_halt();
> > + else
> > + while (1)
> > + halt();
> > }
>
> I like the asm version .. but this code makes me blink.
> when you HAVE clflush you do wbinvd.
> yeah I know it's correct but... it reads wonky ;)
It's the most convenient symbol to test against. I
suppose I should add a comment explaining it.
> also.. can we move that check into the wbinvd_halt() itself, so that
> the callers don't need to care what is used to select it ?
irqflags.h doesn't guarantee the presence of boot_cpu_data,
so I wasn't able to make that check cleanly. I could move
the macro definition to process_??.c if that would better.
-Mark Langsdorf
Operating System Research Center
AMD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists