| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080814202039.GA4509@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:20:39 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, andi@...stfloor.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, malware-list@...ts.printk.net, malware-list-bounces@...sg.printk.net, peterz@...radead.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model? well sorta. On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > We do need a standardized way of enabling it (since it does cost you > something in performance, so not everyone will want it on), and a > standardized way of reading i_version out to userspace. Maybe a mount > option is the right way to do it, maybe not. > > We may want to take this to the linux-fs list and try to get > agreements on these points; the main reason why it's not enabled by > default in ext4 is because the NFSv4 advanced caching code is in > common use (is it even in mainline)? I have not yet seen code actually using it at all, neither in mainline nor on one of the many nfs development lists. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists