[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080814194111.GH22488@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:41:11 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, andi@...stfloor.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, malware-list@...ts.printk.net,
malware-list-bounces@...sg.printk.net, peterz@...radead.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model? well sorta.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:34:08PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> It's not used at all on regular files except for ext4 with a non-default,
> undocumented mount option. XFS will grow it soon in a similar way as ext4,
> except that it will be documented or I might have even figured out by
> then how to just enabled it from nfsd.
We do need a standardized way of enabling it (since it does cost you
something in performance, so not everyone will want it on), and a
standardized way of reading i_version out to userspace. Maybe a mount
option is the right way to do it, maybe not.
We may want to take this to the linux-fs list and try to get
agreements on these points; the main reason why it's not enabled by
default in ext4 is because the NFSv4 advanced caching code is in
common use (is it even in mainline)?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists