[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080815163537.GB7178@lenovo>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:35:38 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
yhlu.kernel@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 8/8] x86: apic - unify init_bsp_APIC
[Maciej W. Rozycki - Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100]
| On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
|
| > Since lapic_is_integrated is just eliminated on 64bit I thought
| > it's better to have smooth code flow as much as possible. By 'smooth'
| > I mean to not use #ifdef until there is no chance to escape from.
|
| Of course!
|
| > And Maciej - you're so right - if someone will take a look on the
| > apic_64.c code now he will be quite wondered what lapic_is_integrated
| > is doing in 64bit code.
|
| I just questioned the purpose of reformatting the comment. I see no
| problem with lapic_is_integrated() appearing in 64-bit code -- if someone
| cannot figure out why it would appear there, they better practised some
| thinking at home before coming back. We have plenty of places with such
| constructs that expand to literals for some configurations all over our
| tree anyway.
|
| Maciej
|
Ah... it was about comment, now it's clear what you meant (for me).
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists