linux-kernel - RE: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model? well sorta.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	"Press, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Press@...com>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...el.hist.no>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, malware-list@...ts.printk.net,
	hch@...radead.org, andi@...stfloor.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model?  well sorta.

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Press, Jonathan wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: david@...g.hm [mailto:david@...g.hm]
>>> The problem is that you have to account for the cases where the
> malware
>>> made it onto the system even if you were trying to catch it ahead of
>>> time.  For example:
>>>
>>> - Administrator turns off or reduces AV protection for some reason
> for
>>> some period of time.  It happens all the time.
>>
>> according to the threat model actions of the administrator do not
> matter.
>
> Sorry, I don't know what you mean.

the threat model that was posted two days ago in the initial message of 
this thread specificly stated that actions of root are not something that 
this is trying to defend against.

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/