[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080817170714.GA29938@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:07:14 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com>
Cc: Mirco Tischler <mt-ml@....de>,
Leonid Podolny <leonidp.lists@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhu@...el.com,
reinette.chatre@...el.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
IvDoorn@...il.com
Subject: Re: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville
> <linville@...driver.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >
> >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close
> >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and
> >> are apparently wrong.
> >
> > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even
> > if you don't know how to fix them)?
> >
>
> 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424
> This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though
> they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be
> acked by Yi or me.
And in general, they are. In general I would prefer if you would
work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically
dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once. C'est la vie...
> I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch.
Thanks!
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@...driver.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists