linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: fix towards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808181740500.3324@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_balloon: fix towards_target when deflating
 balloon



On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote: <
> 
> This handles the case where v < vb->num_pages and ensures we get a 
> small, negative, s64 as the result.

That's just horrible code.

Maybe the compiler notices that you're doing something stupid, but 
basically, please don't do this.

> -	return v - vb->num_pages;
> +	if (v < vb->num_pages)
> +		return -(s64)(vb->num_pages - v);
> +	else
> +		return v - vb->num_pages;

What's wrong with just doing

	return (s64)v - vb->num_pages;

instead?

Casting 'v' to s64 guarantees that the subtraction will eb done in 64 
bits, and the compiler can just generate the trivial non-conditional code.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/