[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808210110.37204.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:10:36 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Subject: Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
On Thursday 21 August 2008 00:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 18:32 +0400, adobriyan@...il.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:32:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > +#define avg(x, y) ({ \
> > > + typeof(x) _avg1 = ((x)+1)/2; \
> > > + typeof(x) _avg2 = ((y)+1)/2; \
> >
> > ITYM, typeof(y)
>
> you thought right, I did mean that :-)
>
> > > + (void) (&_avg1 == &_avg2); \
> > > + _avg1 + _avg2; })
I don't think this implementation of avg should go in kernel.h?
It gives an average of 1 and 1 to be 2, 3 and 3 is 4, 1 and 3 is
3 etc.
Maybe it is reasonable for very high numbers that would overflow
if added first, but it doesn't seem reasonable for a generic
averaging function.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists