[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1219301306.8781.55.camel@ymzhang>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:48:26 +0800
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Subject: Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 08:16 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > > ok, i've applied this one to tip/sched/urgent instead of the
> > > feature-disabling patchlet. Yanmin, could you please check whether this
> > > one does the trick?
> >
> > This new patch almost doesn't help volanoMark. Pls. use the patch
> > which sets LB_BIAS=1 by default.
>
> ok. That also removes the kernel.h complications ;-)
Sorry, I have new update.
Originally, I worked on 2.6.27-rc1. I just move to 2.6.27-rc3 and found
something defferent when CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=n.
With 2.6.27-rc3, on my 8-core stoakley, all volanoMark regression disappears,
no matter if I enable LB_BIAS. On 16-core tigerton, the regression is still
there if I don't enable LB_BIAS and regression becomes 11% from 65%.
8-core stoakley:
2.6.26_nogroup 340669
2.6.27-rc1_nogroup 267237
2.6.27-rc1_nogroup+LB_BIAS=1 330693
2.6.27-rc3_nogroup 352193
2.6.27-rc3_nogroup+LB_BIAS=1 355872
16-core tigerton:
2.6.26_nogroup 539644
2.6.27-rc1_nogroup 309334
2.6.27-rc1_nogroup+LB_BIAS=1 478360
2.6.27-rc3_nogroup 348426
2.6.27-rc3_nogroup+LB_BIAS=1 483150
-yanmin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists