linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f11576a0808210018h157b0eddr1c327ecad8315cad@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:18:00 +0900
From:	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	tokunaga.keiich@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs

>> sparc64 allmodconfig:
>>
>> mm/quicklist.c: In function `max_pages':
>> mm/quicklist.c:44: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&'
>>
>> we seem to have a made a spectacular mess of cpumasks lately.
>
> It should explode similarly on x86, since it also defines node_to_cpumask()
> as an inline function.
>
> IA64 seems to be one of the few platforms to define this as a macro
> evaluating to the node-to-cpumask array entry, so it's clear what
> platform Motohiro-san did build testing on :-)

Thank you good advice.
I don't have sparc64 machine but I can get borrowing x86 machine.
So, I'll test on x86 today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/