[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080821112309.6519c29f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:23:09 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...vo.org>
Cc: Tosoni <jp.tosoni@...sys.fr>,
"'Laurent Pinchart'" <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>,
"'Aristeu Rozanski'" <arozansk@...hat.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] 8250: add support for DTR/DSR hardware flow control
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:43:36 -0400
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...vo.org> wrote:
> > > About a RS485 ioctl: could you consider the attached files which are already
> > > in the Linux kernel (in include/asm-cris).
> > > They define a TIOCSERSETRS485 (ioctl.h), and the data structure (rs485.h)
> > > with allows to specify timings. Sounds just like what we want ?
> >
> > I had a deeper look at this for RS485 and the answer is "sort of". I've
> > reworked the structure to keep it the same size irrespective of 32/64bit
> > systems, and to make stuff flags that can be, plus add some extra u32
> > words in case we need to (.. when we need to ;)) add stuff later.
> >
> > Comments, thoughts - will this do what people in the RS485 world need ?
> as for DTR/DSR patch, will be used the same approach?
I'm still trying to get a sensible answer on how other Unixes handle it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists