[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080821104252.GA26516@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:42:52 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: export pv_lock_ops non-GPL
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
> > None of the spinlock API is exported GPL, so there's no reason for
> > pv_lock_ops to be.
>
> uhm, why is this even a question? All of this stuff is so deep inside
> the guts of the kernel ... so nope - if then we want to change the
> others to _GPL exports as well, just to make sure nobody gets funny
> ideas.
i've nevertheless applied it to tip/x86/urgent - but it would be nice to
clean all of this up and only export the minimally necessary (ex include
file inline functions) APIs and none of the paravirt stuff.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists