linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:43:50 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	carsteno@...ibm.com
Cc:	jaredeh@...il.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
	tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem

On Thursday 21 August 2008 20:25, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Jared Hulbert wrote:
> > I'd like to get a first round of review on my AXFS filesystem.
>
> I like the general approach of it. It's much more flexible than the
> ext2 extension I've done, and the possibility to select XIP vs.
> compression per page is really really neat. I can imagine that people
> will prefer this over the ext2 implementation on s390. It is unclear
> to me how the "secondary block device" thing is supposed to work.
> Could you elaborate a bit on that?

Agreed. I haven't had a good look through it yet, but at a glance it
looks pretty neat. The VM side of things looks pretty reasonable
(I fear XIP faulting might have another race or two, but that's a
core mm issue rather than filesystem specific).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/