[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1219616136.14389.12.camel@localhost>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:15:36 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...il.com>,
Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de, bfields@...ldses.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export.
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 23:09 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (added some quoting from previous mail to save replying twice)
>
> On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 15:19 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 15:17 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > >From the tcpdump, it looks as if the NFS server is failing to close the
> > > socket, when the client closes its side. You therefore end up getting
> > > stuck in the FIN_WAIT2 state (as netstat clearly shows above).
> > >
> > > Is the server keeping the client in this state for a very long
> > > period?
>
> Well, it had been around an hour and a half on this occasion. Next time
> it happens I can wait longer but I'm pretty sure I've come back from
> time away and it's been wedged for at least a day. How long would you
> expect it to remain in this state for?
The server should ideally start to close the socket as soon as it
receives the FIN from the client. I'll have a look at the code.
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists