[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d4jyys7y.fsf@jondo.cante.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:16:01 +0300
From: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@...te.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space - Asus M2N32 AMD 8GB memory
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> writes:
> Jari Aalto wrote:
>>>> $ grep -Ei 'iommu|agp' /boot/config-2.6.25-2-amd64
>>>> CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y
>>>> CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU=y
>>>> CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=y
>>>> CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y
>>>> CONFIG_AGP=y
>>>> CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
>>>> CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=m
>>>> CONFIG_AGP_SIS=m
>>>> CONFIG_AGP_VIA=m
>>> Do you have problems without "iommu=XXX"?
>>
>> ...whole harddisk to corrupt and I had to reinstall everything.
>> It might have been a little older kernel (2.6.23?), but I don't recall
>> it exactly.
>>
>> Would you suggest that "immu=off" would be best option?
>
> No, you can't use iommu=off. If you have memory located over 4GB and
> devices which can only do 32-bit DMA then you need some kind of IOMMU
> support, otherwise things will just blow up.
>
> If you use no options and it's enabled in the kernel config it should be
> using the GART IOMMU built into the CPU on this machine..
So, with newest kernel I should just leave 'iommu' out from boot
options. I could try to upgrade even to 2.6.26, which Debian has in
unstable repository.
What, if after booting to 2.6.26 and without any 'iommu' boot parameters,
there still appears "Out of Iommu space" messages? What kind of logs
should I post?
I'm a bit nervous due to past experience of complete hardd disk
corruption. But if that was problem with the old kernel and more later
versions are safer in this repect, I could once more.
Jari
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists