[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B2F180.6050503@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:53:04 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86_64 UV: Use LED to indicate CPU is active
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Illuminate "activity" LED when CPU is going "active",
>>> + * extinguish when going "idle".
>>> + */
>>> +static int uv_idle(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *junk)
>>> +{
>>> + if (action == IDLE_START)
>>> + uv_set_led_bits(0, LED_CPU_ACTIVITY);
>>> +
>>> + else if (action == IDLE_END)
>>> + uv_set_led_bits(LED_CPU_ACTIVITY, LED_CPU_ACTIVITY);
>>> +
>>> + return NOTIFY_OK;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct notifier_block uv_idle_notifier = {
>>> + .notifier_call = uv_idle,
>>> +};
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Initialize idle led callback function
>>> + */
>>> +static __init void uv_init_led_idle_display(void)
>>> +{
>>> + /* initialize timer for activity monitor */
>>> + idle_notifier_register(&uv_idle_notifier);
>>> +}
>> hm, i think this is a bad idea. While putting it into the go-to-idle
>
> Plus this really should not be uv-specific. We already have generic
> triggers.
>
> And you should really CC led maintainers!
> Pavel
Thanks for the pointers, I will definitely look into this.
(And sorry for not discovering the LED docs and maintainers earlier.)
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists