[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080825175547.GA26131@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:55:47 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] cpufreq: constant cpu_khz
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 02:39:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > > I noticed that my sched_clock() was slow on a number of machine, so
> > > I started looking at cpufreq.
> >
> > The below seems to fix the problem for me, but I don't have enough
> > clue to know if its the correct fix, please advise.
>
> > - set_cyc2ns_scale(tsc_khz_ref, freq->cpu);
> > + set_cyc2ns_scale(tsc_khz, freq->cpu);
>
> hm, that too is due to the tsc.c unification - Alok Cc:-ed. Applied your
> fix to x86/urgent.
ACKed-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Good catch Peter. I'm puzzled how that bug was latent on 64bit
for so long with no-one realising though.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists