linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: printk_time to use tsc before cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080827080238.GC4453@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:02:38 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: printk_time to use tsc before cpu_clock is ready


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > +static unsigned long long tsc_clock(int cpu)
> > > +{
> > > +	unsigned long long t;
> > > +
> > > +	rdtscll(t);
> > > +
> > > +	return t;
> > > +}
> > 
> > hm, i'm not sure i like the whole direction - this reintroduces 
> > printk_clock in essence.
> > 
> > how about initializing cpu_clock() sooner, so that printk timestamps 
> > start ticking as soon as possible?
> 
> which will make some archs quite unhappy iirc, see those arm and ia64 
> bugs I caused the other day.

that's OK - that still allows arches to start their clocks whenever they 
want to. But also add the possibility for architectures to initialize 
things even sooner.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/