linux-kernel - Re: Is SKAS still required for UML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080827210319.GA14123@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:03:19 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is SKAS still required for UML

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 04:00:24PM -0400, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> In tests of mine, oggenc in SKAS0 mode ran at 95% of native speed, which 
> is pretty good.

Different workloads give different results.  Yours sounds
CPU-intensive.  Kernel builds here run at 50-60% of native with skas0,
low 80's with skas3, and ~86% with skas4.

    	      	     	 Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/